俗話說，磨刀不誤砍柴工，這句話同樣適用于考研備考。在備考時，適當的真題練習也是非常重要的。鑒于此，幫考網在下面為大家帶來考研初試英語的部分翻譯真題，一起來看一看。

Directions:

Read thefollowing text carefully ａｎｄ then translate the underlined segments intoChinese. Your translation should be written neatly on the ANSWER SHEET. (10points)

It wasonly after I started to write a weekly column about the medical journals, andbegan to read scientific papers from beginning to end, that I realised just howbad much of the medical literature frequently was. I came to recognise varioussigns of a bad paper: the kind of paper that purports to show that people whoeat more than one kilo of broccoli a week were 1.17 times more likely thanthose who eat less to suffer late in life from pernicious anaemia. (46) Thereis a great deal of this kind of nonsense in the medical journals which, whentaken up by broadcasters ａｎｄ the lay press, generates both health scares andshort-lived dietary enthusiasms.

Why is somuch bad science published? A recent paper, titled “The Natural ｓｅｌｅｃｔion of Bad Science”, published on the Royal Society’s open science website, attempts to answerthis intriguing ａｎｄ important question. It says that the problem is not merelythat people do bad science, but that our current system of career advancementpositively encourages it. What is important is not truth, but publication,which has become almost an end in itself. There has been a kind of inflationaryprocess at work: (47) nowadays anyone applying fｏｒa research post has to havepublished twice the number of papers that would have been required fｏｒthe samepost only 10 years ago. Never mind the quality, then, count the number.

(48)Attempts have been made to curb this tendency, fｏｒexample, by trying toincorporate some measure of quality as well as quantity into the assessment ofan applicant’s papers. This is the famedcitation index, that is to say the number of times a paper has been quotedelsewhere in the scientific literature, the assumption being that an importantpaper will be cited more often than one of small account. (49) This would bereasonable if it were not fｏｒthe fact that scientists can easily arrange tocite themselves in their future publications, ｏｒget associates to do so forthem in return fｏｒsimilar favours.

Boilingdown an individual’s output to simple metrics, suchas number of publications ｏｒjournal impacts, entails considerable savings intime, energy ａｎｄ ambiguity. Unfortunately, the long-term costs of using simplequantitative metrics to assess researcher merit are likely to be quite great.(50) If we are serious about ensuring that our science is both meaningful andreproducible, we must ensure that our institutions encourage that kind ofscience.

以上就是幫考網為大家帶來的全部信息，希望能給大家一些幫助。在最后階段，小伙伴們要注意調整自己的心態，以良好的心態去迎接考試。最后，幫考網預祝準備參加2022年考研的小伙伴都能成功上岸。